Tinnitus E-Programme

Go to content
19 December 2017

Why is therapy support being made available now?

1. Analysis of TEP Users presented at the University of Manchester 10 November 2017

  • I completed an analysis of the use of the Tinnitus E-Programme (TEP) in November that included the first 22 users (from July 2017) that I presented at the University of Manchester Tinnitus Study week. There are more people who have registered since of course.

  • The main outcome of the analysis was that more than 50% (12 of the 22) of those sending in their initial THI (Tinnitus Handicap Inventory) had scores rating beyond the “Moderate Tinnitus Distress” category (58% or higher).

  • The same pattern has unsurprisingly continued for those registered since I completed the analysis. These high levels of tinnitus distress make self-directed learning and practical application extremely challenging, and many registrants are understandably giving up early - often as soon as after Module One - and therefore not completing the course.

  • I have run tinnitus management clinics for 25 years +, mostly NHS and more recently in private practise, and would never expect any patient with such high levels of tinnitus distress to manage on their own without support.

  • The online self-directed Tinnitus E-Programme was never intended for these levels of tinnitus distress.

2.  Key Findings of the Independent Evaluation of the Tinnitus E-Programme by the NHS NIHR NHBRU (2014-2016) - final research paper still awaiting publication

The second and supporting findings indicating a need for change came through the NHS NIHR NHBRU independent evaluation of the Tinnitus E-Programme:

  • 1, 2 and 6 were good outcomes

  • 3, 4 and 5 reflected the shortfalls

  • These were rectified as indicated in red below:
1. Acceptability of the Tinnitus E-Programme was high among people with tinnitus ü

2. Benefits gained focused on knowledge, acceptance, coping and behaviour change ü

3. User engagement varied across the self-managed components û
User engagement vastly improved through direct therapist input (incorporated July 2018) ü

4. Relaxation component was valued by users but adherence to the relaxation goals was poor û
Relaxation component highly valued by users; adherence to the relaxation goals vastly improved through direct therapist input and additional behaviour techniques* incorporated in to the course ü
 
5. Adherence may be improved with additional behaviour techniques*
Additional behaviour techniques* incorporated in to the course

6. It is important to deliver the programme to the right people at the right time ü

1 July 2018 - TEP Therapist Support became standard for TEP Users

Go back to 'About TEP Support'
CBT for Tinnitus E-Programme © 2009-2024

CBT for Tinnitus E-Programme Ltd
Company Number: 15206830
Company Director: Debbie Featherstone


Back to content